|
HR MATTERS E-TIPS
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: FLSA: When is a Manager Really Exempt?
Published by Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
"Your Policy and Compliance Experts Since 1972"
| |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: FLSA: When is a Manager Really Exempt?
The FLSA executive exemption seems straightforward enough, yet many
organizations have had problems resulting from classifying employees
improperly as exempt managers. Find out what criteria your employees
must meet to avoid overtime payouts and penalties. |
|
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = |
|
|
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: FLSA: When is a Manager Really Exempt?
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) executive exemption arguably is
fairly easy to implement. As a general rule, if employees are
responsible
for two or more employees, can hire and fire, and manage a
department
or store, they will meet the criteria.
However, over the last few years, this executive exemption has been
the
subject of several high-profile overtime cases, typically involving
employees who were managers in name only or who also performed the
job duties of nonexempt employees in their charge. Starbucks,
RadioShack, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Family Dollar stores all have
been targeted by class action suits seeking millions of dollars in
overtime
for employees allegedly improperly categorized as exempt employees.
So how do you avoid becoming the next multi-million dollar suit?
Find
out below what it takes to meet the executive exemption. (Download
free report: “FLSA Exemption Regulations.”)
* The Regulations’ Criteria *
According to the FLSA regulations that took effect August 24, 2004
(found in 29 C.F.R. §§541.100, et seq.), workers are employed in an
executive capacity if they are compensated on a salary basis at a
rate of
at least $455 per week (equal to $23,660 annually), exclusive of
board,
lodging, or other facilities. In addition, the workers’ job duties
must meet
all three of the following criteria:
1. Their primary duty consists of the management of the enterprise
in
which they are employed or of a customarily recognized department or
subdivision of it. Examples of the “management of the enterprise”
include: interviewing, selecting, and training employees; setting
and
adjusting employee pay and hours of work; directing the work of
employees; appraising employee productivity and efficiency for the
purpose of recommending promotions or other changes in status;
disciplining employees; planning the work; determining the type of
materials, supplies, machinery, equipment, or tools to be used or
merchandise to be bought, stocked, and sold; providing for the
safety
and security of employees or the property; planning and controlling
the
budget; and implementing legal compliance measures.
A “customarily recognized department or subdivision” must have a
permanent status and a continuing function, as distinguished from a
“mere collection of employees” assigned sporadically to a specific
job.
2. They customarily and regularly direct the work of two or more
full-
time employees or their equivalent. For example, one full-time
employee
plus two half-time employees equals two full-time employees. Note
that
an employee who supervises two or more employees only in a
manager’s absence does not meet the exemption.
3. They have the authority to hire or fire other employees, or their
suggestions and recommendations are given particular weight
concerning the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion, or any other
change of status of other employees. Factors to consider to
determine if
suggestions and recommendations are given “particular weight”
include
whether it is part of the employee’s job duties to make the
suggestions
and recommendations, the frequency with which they are made or
requested, and the frequency with which they are relied on.
To qualify, the executive’s suggestions and recommendations must
pertain to employees whom the executive customarily and regularly
directs, not to occasional suggestions regarding the status of a
coworker. However, the executive’s suggestions and recommendations
will still be considered to have the necessary weight even if a
higher-
level manager can overturn the decision, or if the executive does
not
have authority to make the ultimate decision about an employee.
The new regulations also contain an exemption for employees who are
20% equity business owners and who are actively involved in the
management of the business. (Download
free report: “FLSA Exemption
Regulations”)
However, an employee who is training for employment in
an executive position and who is not actually performing the exempt
duties for that occupation is not considered exempt. |
|
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = |
|
|
* Guidance from the Courts and the DOL *
Cases that were decided under both the old and new regulations
and a
recent Department of Labor (DOL) opinion letter provide helpful
guidance
on how the executive exemption has been applied, particularly in
determining whether an employee’s job duties qualify for the
exemption.
(Note, though, only a few cases have been reported interpreting
the new
executive regulations.)
In Thomas v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC, 506 F.3d 496 (6th Cir.
2007), decided under the old regulations, the Sixth Circuit
found that a
manager for a chain retail store had management as her primary
job duty
even though she indicated she spent only 40% of her time on
managerial
duties. The court determined that the employee met the executive
exemption based on the facts that her managerial duties such as
hiring
and training employees and assigning the weekly work schedule
were
much more important to the running of the business than her
nonmanagerial duties such as stocking shelves and cleaning
bathrooms,
and that she was generally unsupervised in her work.
Similarly, the DOL determined in a recent opinion letter, FLSA
2006-29,
that a gas station manager was still considered exempt even
though he
occasionally “worked the drive,” performing duties of a
nonexempt
station attendant. The manager typically would act as an
attendant only
for a few hours every year. According to the DOL, a manager who
performs nonexempt duties for a full day at very irregular and
infrequent
intervals still meets the primary duty requirements for exempt
executive
employees.
In contrast, in a case involving both the old and new
regulations, in Davis
v. Mountaire Farms, Inc., 453 F.3d 554 (3d Cir. 2006), the Third
Circuit
found that testimony from the crew leaders indicated that they
were not
exempt managers because their job duties did not include hiring,
firing,
or recruiting crew members and that they did not have the
authority to do
any of these duties as required by the FLSA exemption.
Accordingly, the
court sent the case back for further deliberation to determine
the
employees’ status.
* Get Executive Classification Right or Pay the Price *
It has been nearly four years since the new exemption
regulations took
effect, and many employers are still struggling to comply with
them. If
you think you have exemption classification problems, you should
fix
them or expect to face expensive fines and lawsuits. (Download
free
report: “FLSA Exemption Regulations.”)
Under the regulations, your organization could be liable for
overtime pay
going back up to two years for any employee who is misclassified
as
exempt. And, this back pay liability typically is extended to
three years if
you are found to have willfully (intentionally) violated the
law.
As an example, Family Dollar recently was hit with a $19.l
million dollar
jury verdict in favor of over a thousand store managers. The
managers
were improperly categorized as exempt executives because they
did not
supervise enough employees or their primary job duties did not
meet the
exemption’s criteria. The company also could face an additional
$20
million in liquidated damages, not to mention attorneys’ fees.
Clearly, misclassifications can be expensive. So be sure that
your
exempt managers not only supervise the requisite number of
employees,
but also do not spend too much time performing the work of their
subordinates. If they are spending more time serving your
customers
than managing your employees, you need to reevaluate their
classifications. Otherwise, you could face a class action
lawsuit and
serious penalties. |
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ New Online Version
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
|
Announcing
Personnel Policy
Manual System
+
HR Matters Tools
& Resource Center
From
Your E-Tips Editors
For over 35 years, many of our subscribers have
referred to the print and CD versions of our Personnel Policy Manual as their
“HR Policy Bible.”
Now, we’ve gone one step further and developed the ultimate policy and
compliance solution:
-
Online version of the “HR Policy Bible”
-
Complete resource center
-
All supporting databases: research, newsletters, Q&A
-
Available 24/7
-
Full legal documentation and HR best practices
Learn more
and create a
free account. |

Learn more |
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = |
|
|
Subscribers to the
Personnel Policy Manual (print/online) and HR Policy Answers on
CD can find information on the executive exemption in Hours of Work,
Chapter 207, note 24.
Not a subscriber? If you would like to order one of our policy
chapters,
go to:
http://www.hrpolicyanswers.com.
If you have any questions, please call us at 1-800-437-3735. We'll
be
happy to help you. |
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ HR Policy & Compliance Resources ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Download individual HR Policies for
immediate use in your
organization. Get complete policy development kits: Model Policy
language, Management Rationale background information, and
References for Legal Counsel documentation. Get useful HR Resources.
|
YOU CAN TRUST PPS
Information provided in HR Matters E-Tips is researched and reviewed
by the HR experts at Personnel Policy Service as well as employment
law attorneys. However, it is not intended as legal advice. Readers are
encouraged to seek appropriate legal or other professional advice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Interested in using an article from HR Matters E-Tips on your Web site or
in a newsletter?
Please contact Robin Thomas, Managing Editor of Personnel Policy
Service, Inc., to request permission. You can contact her by email at
editor@ppspublishers.com or by
telephone at 1-800-437-3735.
Please note that the information in every issue of HR Matters E-Tips is
the original, copyrighted work of Personnel Policy Service, Inc., and is
protected under U.S. copyright laws. As such, you may not reprint or
publish in any format any article or portion of article from HR Matters E-
Tips without the express permission of Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
Remember, too, we encourage you to pass along any issue of the E-Tips
by forwarding it to friends and colleagues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A note to advertisers:
Do you want to reach the human resources market?
Your message can be seen by over 65,000 HR professionals when you
sponsor an issue of HR Matters E-Tips.
Contact Elise Whitman at
ezine@ppspublishers.com
or call toll-free 1-800-437-3735.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
HR Matters E-Tips is a f-r-e-e service of Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
To subscribe, go to:
http://www.ppspublishers.com/ezsignup.htm
Personnel Policy Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
HR Matters is a registered trademark of:
Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
159 St. Matthews Ave., Suite 5, Louisville, KY 40207
Tel: 1-800-437-3735 - Fax: 1-800-755-7011
www.ppspublishers.com -
www.instanthrpolicies.com
-
www.hrpolicyanswers.com -
www.personnelpolicyservice.com/hrforum
CONTACT US: ezine@ppspublishers.com
FORWARD THIS ISSUE: We invite you to forward HR Matters E-Tips to
a colleague or friend.
|