|
HR MATTERS E-TIPS
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: ADA Amendments Take Effect Thursday
Published by Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
"Your Policy and Compliance Experts Since 1972"
| |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: ADA Amendments Take Effect Thursday
The ADA has been substantially revised so that more people will be
considered disabled and entitled to accommodation under the law. Find
out how the law has changed and three steps you can take to ensure
your organization is ready when these amendments take effect on
Thursday. |
|
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = |
|
|
THIS WEEK’S E-TIP: ADA Amendments Take Effect Thursday
This article is written by Bruce R. Alper and Timothy J. Tommaso,
attorneys at Vedder Price. Vedder Price, www.vedderprice.com, is a
national business-oriented law firm with over 260 attorneys in
Chicago,
New York, and Washington, D.C., who practice in all areas of
business
law with a particular emphasis on labor and employment law
compliance
and litigation.
Since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became law in 1990,
the
United States Supreme Court and many lower federal courts have
interpreted the statute in a way that has narrowed the population of
persons who are considered to be “disabled” and therefore protected
under the law. This is about to change. On September 25, 2008, the
President signed the “ADA Amendments Act,” which becomes effective
January 1, 2009. These amendments are intended to legislatively
overrule a series of Supreme Court decisions and make it easier for
persons to qualify for protection under the ADA. The legislation no
doubt
will accomplish that purpose.
If your organization has 15 or more employees (including part-time
and
temporary employees), these changes will affect you beginning
January
1, 2009. (Download
a free Serious Diseases model policy with coverage
of the ADA.)
Definition of Disability Is Broader
Courts have taken a hard line over the years in determining what
constitutes a “disability.” Not anymore. The new amendments
expressly
require courts to construe the term disability “in favor of broad
coverage
… to the maximum extent permitted” by the ADA. This circular
language
portends ongoing litigation over what the ADA permits. However
construed, the amendments clearly are intended to expand ADA
coverage to more people. Further, the definition of “disability” now
includes any impairment that is episodic or in remission if it would
substantially limit a major life activity when active.
Super Sized Definition of Major Life Activities
A disability is a physical or mental condition that substantially
limits “one
or more major life activities.” The ADA amendments contain a list of
“major life activities” including: caring for oneself, performing
manual
tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing,
lifting,
bending, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking,
communicating, and working.
A major life activity also includes the “operation of a major bodily
function,” such as “functions of the immune system, normal cell
growth,
digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory,
circulatory,
endocrine and reproductive functions.” The intent is to ensure that
a
broad range of health conditions, including high blood pressure,
diabetes, epilepsy and asthma, may be considered conditions that
affect
major life activities.
Cannot Consider Mitigating Measures
In a 1999 decision, Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471
(1999),
the U.S. Supreme Court held that mitigating factors, such as
prosthetics
and medication that ameliorate the adverse effects of a health
condition,
must be taken into account when determining whether an individual is
disabled. The amendments reject that ruling. The new law explicitly
states that corrective measures should not be taken into account in
determining whether a person’s impairment substantially limits a
major
life activity. Thus the ameliorative effects of medication, mobility
devices,
hearing aids and prosthetics cannot be considered. The one exception
is that “ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses” can be considered
when
determining whether an individual has a disability. |
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Recommended Audio Conference
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
|
Understanding the New FMLA Regulations:
What Changes on January 16
Presented by M. Lee Smith Publishers
LLC
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Thursday, January 29, 2009
11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time
The Department of Labor has finally announced its Family and Medical
Leave Act (FMLA) revisions that go into effect January 16. Employers
don’t have much time to prepare.
In just 90 minutes, you’ll cover the most critical changes including:
-
Clarifying the definitions of “serious
health condition”
-
Prohibiting supervisors from contacting
the employee’s health care provider about medical certification
-
Stopping employers from charging FMLA time
to employees who return but can only perform light-duty work
-
Allowing family members of wounded
military personnel to take up to six months to care for recovering
relatives
-
Handling “qualifying exigency leave”
during active duty
Click
here to learn more, register, or order the CD if you’re unable
to attend. Or, call (800) 274-6774 and please be sure to mention
Conference Code PPME.. |
Learn more
|
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = |
| |
EEOC to Define “Substantially Limits”
The new amendments reject a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court
interpretation,
in Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184
(2002), that the
phrase “substantially limits a major life activity” means an
individual must
have an impairment that prevents or severely restricts the
individual from
engaging in activities that are of central importance to most
people’s
daily lives. However, the law does not provide a new definition.
Rather,
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is required
to
define the phrase “substantially limits” in a manner “consistent
with the
purpose” of the amendments. Employers can be certain that the
EEOC
will take an expansive approach. (Editor’s note: The EEOC voted
on
proposed regulations to implement the ADA Amendments earlier
this
month, but the vote failed because the four-member Commission
split
two to two along party lines. Accordingly, the EEOC could not
issue the
proposed rule. As a result, it likely will be months before any
guidance
will be available.)
More Coverage for Persons “Regarded As” Disabled
The ADA has always protected workers who were “regarded as”
disabled, even if they were not actually disabled. Before the
amendments, claimants needed to show that the employer regarded
them as being substantially limited in a major life activity.
Now, a
“regarded as” claimant need show only that the employer
perceived the
individual as impaired, whether or not the impairment limits or
is
perceived to limit a major life activity. In a minor concession,
the ADA
excludes “regarded as” claims for transitory (six months or
less) and
minor impairments. A more significant clarification of the law
is that an
employer is not required to provide reasonable accommodation to
individuals who are regarded as disabled but are not disabled in
fact.
Conclusion
There is no doubt that the amendments will result in more
disability
discrimination claims and more litigation to sort out the
meaning of the
new statutory provisions. In the short term, here are three
things
employers may want to consider:
1. Review your disability discrimination policies. They
may require
revision to comport with the new statutory definitions of
“disability.”
(Download
a free Serious Diseases model policy with coverage of the
ADA.)
2. Management and human resources professionals should
continue
to take disability issues seriously. Employers should train
their
management staff to be even more vigilant for disability and
accommodation issues given that more employees will now be
eligible
for ADA protection.
3. Employers can expect more accommodation requests.
Since more
employees are now covered under the law, managers and HR
professionals must treat all such requests seriously, continue
to develop
resources and protocols to respond to such requests and consult
with
counsel before deciding that an employee is not entitled to an
accommodation. |
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ New Online Version
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
|
Announcing
Personnel Policy
Manual System
+
HR Matters Tools
& Resource Center
From
Your E-Tips Editors
For over 36 years, many of our subscribers have
referred to the print and CD versions of our Personnel Policy Manual as their
“HR Policy Bible.”
Now, we’ve gone one step further and developed the ultimate policy and
compliance solution:
-
Online version of the “HR Policy Bible”
-
Complete resource center
-
All supporting databases: research, newsletters, Q&A
-
Available 24/7
-
Full legal documentation and HR best practices
Learn more
and create a
free account. |

Learn more |
|
|
|
|
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = |
|
|
Subscribers to the
Personnel Policy Manual and HR Policy Answers on
CD can find more information on the disability definition under the
ADA in
Serious Diseases, Chapter 203A, note 7.
Not a subscriber? If you would like to order one of our policy
chapters,
go to:
http://www.hrpolicyanswers.com.
If you have any questions, please call us at 1-800-437-3735. We'll
be
happy to help you. |
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ HR Policy & Compliance Resources ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Download individual HR Policies for
immediate use in your
organization. Get complete policy development kits: Model Policy
language, Management Rationale background information, and
References for Legal Counsel documentation. Get useful HR Resources.
|
YOU CAN TRUST PPS
Information provided in HR Matters E-Tips is researched and reviewed
by the HR experts at Personnel Policy Service as well as employment
law attorneys. However, it is not intended as legal advice. Readers are
encouraged to seek appropriate legal or other professional advice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Interested in using an article from HR Matters E-Tips on your Web site or
in a newsletter?
Please contact Robin Thomas, Managing Editor of Personnel Policy
Service, Inc., to request permission. You can contact her by email at
editor@ppspublishers.com or by
telephone at 1-800-437-3735.
Please note that the information in every issue of HR Matters E-Tips is
the original, copyrighted work of Personnel Policy Service, Inc., and is
protected under U.S. copyright laws. As such, you may not reprint or
publish in any format any article or portion of article from HR Matters E-
Tips without the express permission of Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
Remember, too, we encourage you to pass along any issue of the E-Tips
by forwarding it to friends and colleagues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A note to advertisers:
Do you want to reach the human resources market?
Your message can be seen by over 65,000 HR professionals when you
sponsor an issue of HR Matters E-Tips.
Contact Elise Whitman at
ezine@ppspublishers.com
or call toll-free 1-800-437-3735.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
HR Matters E-Tips is a f-r-e-e service of Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
To subscribe, go to:
http://www.ppspublishers.com/ezsignup.htm
© 2008 Personnel Policy Service, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
HR Matters is a registered trademark of:
Personnel Policy Service, Inc.
159 St. Matthews Ave., Suite 5, Louisville, KY 40207
Tel: 1-800-437-3735 - Fax: 1-800-755-7011
www.ppspublishers.com -
www.instanthrpolicies.com
-
www.hrpolicyanswers.com -
www.personnelpolicyservice.com/hrforum
CONTACT US: ezine@ppspublishers.com
FORWARD THIS ISSUE: We invite you to forward HR Matters E-Tips to
a colleague or friend.
|
|
|